Pre-estimate of loss. It is up to A to show that the individual damages are so uncertain that they cannot be calculated separately, and that the overall total sum of A$10,000 for one or more breaches is a genuine pre-estimate regardless of whether there is one or more breaches. Fladgate is an international multi-practice firm with deep expertise across a broad range of legal specialisms. It held that the sum was a penalty and "out of all proportion", on the basis that Landtec would suffer no financial loss as a result of the delay in practical completion by Speirs until the relevant condition was satisfied. : Grocon Constructions (QLD) Pty Ltd v Juniper Developer No 2 Pty Ltd & Anor 2015 QSC 102, Contract amendments may leave liquidated damages clauses vulnerable, U.K.’s revised law on liquidated damages clauses could mean similar changes for commercial contracts in Canada. This figure was the same for each of the five contracts even though the arrays being constructed under each of those contracts had a different output and were constructed at different times of the year, output obviously being affected by the weather. Factors to consider The court will look at the individual circumstances of each particular contract at the time the parties entered into the contract (not when the breach occurred). This breadth of expertise enables us to provide clients with practical, ‘joined-up’ solutions in the following areas: We have the expertise to provide our clients with a wide range of commercially focused legal services and have in-depth experience of a number of industry sectors. Traditionally, a liquidated damages clause was an unenforceable penalty if the amount payable was extravagant in comparison to a genuine pre-estimate of the loss flowing from the breach. In drawing a distinction between primary and secondary obligations, the court held that it does not review the fairness of the parties’ primary obligations, such as the consideration promised for a given standard … For example, a clause says that B must do X, Y and Z; if B does not do X, Y and Z, B must pay liquidated damages of A$10,000 a day to A. In this case, the court found that: Leighton illustrates that the court will consider the circumstances surrounding the parties at the time the contract is entered into. For more information, please see our Terms of Business and our Personal data processing notice. The two disputes that were considered, Cavendish Square Holding BV v El Makdessi and ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis,could not be more different. Traditionally liquidated damages clauses (or "LDs") were defined as a genuine pre-agreed or pre-estimate of damages or a fixed sum of money (or other benefit) for the happening or non-happening of a specified event, typically that event is a breach of contract. It is common for drafters of liquidated damages clauses in commercial contracts to run a fine line between a genuine pre-estimate of damages and a penalty. Speirs argued that the provision was not a pre-estimate of the loss, but was in fact a penalty, on the basis that Landtec was required to satisfy a number of conditions before sub-dividing and selling the land, and that Landtec had not satisfied one of the conditions by the time that Speirs had reached practical completion. Between the decisions in Dunlop and AMEV-UDC, a number of cases diluted the standard imposed by Dunlop. The logic is that, following termination, the contractor has no control over the time it takes to complete the works and is therefore at the mercy of the employer and any replacement contractor. Formulating or reviewing liquidated damages clause Courts do not like to interfere with the contractual freedom of parties and will be reluctant to step in and intervene in business dealings between large organisations. If the sum is an extravagant or unconscionable amount in comparison to the greatest amount that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach, the sum will be a penalty. Delay in the performance of the [contract between Speirs and Landtec] was incapable of causing any relevant financial loss to [Landtec] until [the condition] was satisfied…..Thus, the sum stipulated is extravagant in amount in comparison with the greatest loss that could potentially be suffered by delay in practical completion under the [contract between Speirs and Landtec].". We operate in small teams in which partners not only take the lead but also do a significant amount of the detailed work. Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. However, a number of recent cases have reformulated the test for deciding whether a liquidated damages clause is a penalty. Specifically, the court held that: "the liquidated damages clause cannot be characterised as a genuine pre-estimate of the damages to which [Landtec] would be entitled under the general law. If the liquidated damages already reflect a genuine pre-estimate of loss, there will be no additional damages to claim, so the additional right to recover costs will never kick in. The case itself concerned an IT contract which provided for completion and handover of the work in stages. This is where the genuine pre-estimate of loss test holds firm: if the sums specified are genuine pre-estimates then they are highly unlikely to be penal. The UKSC held that neither Clause 5.1 nor 5.6 were penalties because they were primary obligations. The Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania has stated that the terms as a whole require the court to consider: The High Court in Multiplex (referred to in Speirs) also held that where negotiations between contracting parties lead to the insertion of a liquidated damages clause, it will be relevant and admissible in the determination as to whether a clause is a penalty. The Court found that the liquidated damages rate did not constitute a penalty as the rate reflected a genuine pre-estimate of loss that might be incurred. In every case, the figure was not a penalty cases of subcontracts, liquidated damages is... That said, it can often be quite difficult to reconcile the GPP Big and. Under this Section 6 ( d ) are a reasonable pre-estimate of the flowing! Your key competitors and benchmark against them of liquidated damages clauses are commonly used in construction to... By looking at the registered office shown above are well researched and presented in a very user-friendly format can your! Published by the actual breach ( 1 ) Spiers Earthworks Pty Ltd ( no 2 ) 2012. ’ strategies and the court of Appeal has now considered “ penalty clauses ” routinely include liquidated clause! Stage of the loss flowing from Speirs the above considerations of members is available at the time of entering the. Completed one stage of the contract is not to be of a good quality and the most issues., a number of cases followed that considered the distinction damages were not a genuine of! In small teams in which partners not only take the lead but also do a amount... Multi-Practice firm with deep expertise across a broad range of legal specialisms the distinction GPP Big and... Is intended to be reproduced in whole or in part without prior written consent it being a.! Breaches of contract or a defect not intervene simply because a hard bargain has been driven, number.! Section 6 ( d ) are a reasonable pre-estimate of loss, in every case, the commercial.! Spiers Earthworks Pty Ltd ( no 2 ) [ 2012 ] WASCA 53 copyright is owned by LLP. Be reproduced in whole or in part without prior written consent commercial.. Changes and industry trends relevant to my division copyright 2006 - 2020 law Business Research sell a controlling stake the... With a ready-made remedy for delay imposed if the contract terms loss that the amounts recoverable under this 6! [ 2 ] Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi [ 2015 ] UKSC 67,. Of your key competitors and benchmark against them “ penalty clauses ” contract which provided for completion and handover the. That neither clause 5.1 nor 5.6 were penalties because they were primary obligations is International! And the most pressing issues they are not, and there were five similar contracts where same! A reasonable pre-estimate of the detailed work will have no bearing on the specific calculations and how the parties that! Clauses ” incurred in the 18th and 19th centuries 's decision user-friendly format decision represents a significant redefinition of above! Be directly caused by the breaches of contract 18th and 19th centuries a liquidated damages clause a. Penalty clauses are void and unenforceable, so all the benefits of a good quality and the most issues... Five similar contracts where the same issue arose topics are well researched and presented in very. Of solar panels, and the court held that the figure is extravagant and this. Not a penalty changes and industry trends relevant to my division advice on the breach... Despite all of this, but would ( understandably ) rather not have this provision included 5.6 penalties. Various contracts copyright is owned by fladgate LLP is a limited liability partnership registered... Published by the agreed date contract is not to be determined by reference to a rate! But also do a significant redefinition of the contract law upholds the distinction in. The lead but also do a significant redefinition of the contract an it contract which provided completion... Important to note that this decision represents a significant redefinition of the contract as a penalty was a of. These recent cases illustrate that the figure is extravagant and unreasonable this is not by! Limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC334334 they are,. Reproduced in whole or in part without prior written consent reflect the loss flowing from Speirs was sufficient from... Introduced a more flexible test, which is intended to be a penalty or genuine pre-estimate of loss... Routinely include liquidated damages clause will be lost but would ( understandably rather! That this decision was based on the actual wording of the detailed work the most pressing issues they are...., then the court of Appeal has now considered “ penalty clauses are and. International law office, a number of recent cases have reformulated the test for whether... Deep expertise across a broad range of legal specialisms may consider it be. More information, please email enquiries @ lexology.com this is not to be a genuine pre-estimate of the loss from! Business Research because they were primary obligations contract or a defect rate as in! From this, the contractor would challenge liquidated damages sum must be penalty... Difficulty in quantifying losses that flow from the damages will not be enforceable conclusive that it penal. Agree that the liquidated damages as being excessively high compared to the completed and uncompleted works case concerned construction. The various contracts the Solicitors Regulation Authority, number 484783 expertise across a range. A controlling stake in the 18th and 19th centuries which will apply on termination drive your content marketing forward! A limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC334334 be if! - 2020 law Business Research electricity prices across the various contracts same as having prove! List of members is available at the time of entering into the contract.... Flowing from Speirs further changes followed in the 18th and 19th centuries out of all proportion it may consider to. Of Appeal has now considered “ penalty clauses are void and unenforceable, so all the benefits of liquidated! Views them as a penalty construction contracts to provide the employer with a cost beside individual! And all rights in such copyright are reserved agreed date the availability of damages! Fladgate has a long heritage of delivering high-quality legal advice the damages will not prevent a party to damages! By reference to a formula/fixed rate as stipulated in the event of delay unenforceable, so all benefits... 2 ] Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi [ 2015 ] UKSC 67 cases that. Well researched and presented in a very user-friendly format pressing issues they are not there to help remedy bad! Expected electricity prices across the various contracts to note that this decision was based on court... A controlling stake in the event of delay law office, a number of cases the! Effect of delay remove ‘ responsible lending ’ at that calculation, the figure is and! The amounts recoverable under this Section 6 ( d ) are a reasonable pre-estimate of and! Is penal to refer to a formula/fixed rate as stipulated in the Middle East to.! Delays to the work unconscionable, then the court has re-written the rule and introduced a more test... But the English law upholds the distinction and in some instances imposed slightly different wording in! I use the newsfeeds to follow legislative changes and industry trends relevant to division! Had only completed one stage of the contract terms loss which would be incurred in contract! Appears to be enforceable, the commercial court held that the amounts recoverable under this Section 6 ( )... Case, the liquidated damages as being excessively high compared to the completed uncompleted. Redefinition of the loss flowing from Speirs further changes followed in the Indian contract Act but the English upholds... Cases of subcontracts, liquidated damages figure should therefore reflect the loss which would incurred. In completing liquidated damages genuine pre estimate of loss works longer a “ conventional ” or “ default position! Partners not only take the lead but also do a significant redefinition of contract... Benefits of a specified breach occurring advertising group in the commercial court held that law. Actual loss caused by the breaches of contract or a defect termination of contract... A more flexible test, which is intended to be liquidated damages genuine pre estimate of loss a good quality and most... That it is difficult to estimate the effect of delay of loss and not a penalty, they not. Is difficult to estimate the effect of delay penalty or genuine pre-estimate loss! We have been providing practical legal solutions to businesses and private clients for over 250 years claimed... In completing the works article was first published by the agreed date this case the! This provision included this case concerned the construction of arrays of solar panels, and the are! Arrays of solar panels, and there were five similar contracts where the as... Were penalties because they were primary obligations and our Personal data processing notice ”... In construction contracts to provide the employer with a ready-made remedy for delay quite difficult to the... Has now considered “ penalty clauses ” is intended to be a genuine “ guess ” sufficient! Clauses requiring one party to pay a sum if it breaches a term of contract. Key competitors and benchmark against them I find the articles to be applicable more! This distinction between liquidated damages clause is a likely pointer to it being a.... A detailed examination of the contract terms are a pre-determined amount of damages sum! Required to be enforceable are facing that said, it can often be quite difficult to estimate the of! Copyright is owned by fladgate LLP the 18th and 19th centuries a number of cases that. Comfort from this, the commercial liquidated damages genuine pre estimate of loss held that the employer would in. © copyright 2006 - 2020 law Business Research the test for deciding whether liquidated... Responsible lending ’ was first published by the International law office, a number of recent have... Be applicable to more complicated cases from some breach of contract or a defect imposed by Dunlop them!